Geothermal – It Ain’t Sexy But It’s Smart
Wind turbines and solar photovoltaic have become the iconic symbols of clean energy and environmental consciousness. But what about the other less ’sexy’ forms of clean energy? Well, of course using less energy is the cleanest form to use, and it is usually the most cost-effective. But for people who want to increase the uptake of energy from clean sources, it may be more difficult. Unfortunately, not everyone has a strong enough wind or solar resource to make those investments cost-effective. Many folks living in urban settings would find it virtually impossible to implement either of those technologies. However, geothermal can provide or assist with heating and cooling needs for urban and rural alike. Geothermal exchange can be scaled for a single family home on up to entire city blocks, or more.
Please enable Javascript and Flash to view this Flash video.
Especially in the North American west, the geothermal resource is quite accessible. Now there are essentially two kinds of (residential) geothermal and I will not go too far into the details other than to say that one kind only needs to dig down 6-12 feet to tap the earth’s stored temperature. The other kind may take hundreds of feet of drilling but taps into a much hotter source. (There are also utility-scale geothermal facilities that are being developed in places where the source cannot be ignored, because hot waters bubble all the way up to the surface. Iceland, for example, gets 26% of its energy from geothermal and they get their remaining energy from hydro).
You Might Also Like
U.S. Navy “Swabs the Decks” with Recycled Wastewater
Billions of Tiny Bugs Have Green Jobs Cleaning Up Polluted Sites
Most Businesses That Have Invested in Renewable Energy Plan to Add More 
Los Angeles Launches Carbon Reduction Surcharge Dedicated for Renewable Investment
March 2nd, 2008 at 1:24 pm
I think you need to draw a clearer distinction between ‘geothermal,’ which uses energy from heated sources beneath the Earth’s surface, and ‘geo-exchange,’ which uses the Earth as a steady-temperature heat sink. The distinction is much the same as that between a furnace and a heat pump.
They are two different technologies. Geothermal is location-specific, while ground source geo-exchange can be used anyplace.
But I appreciate the video clip you found about geo-exchange, and I’m going to have a follow up article for Green Building Elements.
March 2nd, 2008 at 11:26 pm
Phillip-
You’re absolutely right, I could have made the distinction more clearly. I was really just trying to introduce the video, but I also understand that I muddied the waters a little.
March 3rd, 2008 at 10:27 pm
Good resource for geo-exchange: geoexchange.us
May 20th, 2008 at 9:08 am
[...] Geothermal — It Ain’t Sexy, but It’s Smart [...]
May 24th, 2008 at 9:43 am
[...] gadget (usually not very green), but another to see the many forms of solar, wind, geothermal, etc., which are always changing and developing around the world. So when my employer decided to [...]
July 1st, 2008 at 7:23 am
[...] below the ground, the temperature is relatively stable year-round. Timothy Hurst recently posted an article on Cleantechnica that included this introductory video about geoexchange with [...]
July 19th, 2008 at 7:05 pm
[...] “Geothermal: It Ain’t Sexy but it Sure is Smart” :: CleanTechnica [...]
July 28th, 2008 at 2:35 pm
[...] consumed in the U.S. is derived from clean, sustainable energy sources, like solar, wind and geothermal by [...]
July 29th, 2008 at 11:05 pm
[...] consumed in the U.S. is derived from clean, sustainable energy sources, like solar, wind and geothermal by [...]
August 8th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
While it’s difficult to put a price tag on the benefits to the world of green energy, I actually bit off one of these projects for my dream home and was a bit astonished to discover how much this added to the price of my home. I bit the bullet though. Did it “anyway” thinking this was my “forever” house. Now I’ve gotten divorced and had to sell the home and it was a very tough sell. I’m sure the new owners are happy now after a year of low heating and cooling bills, but to ask an extra $30-35K US for a home is difficult. Does anybody know what is being done to make these systems more affordable? When I did mine, my state had zero tax incentives for such systems.
October 1st, 2008 at 9:38 pm
I also installed one of these systems. Here in So Cal hardly anyone has heard of them. The contractor I was using went out fo business half way through through the project. Drilling and trenching costs are astroniomical and I don’t know why. I rented a trencher and put in the rest of the pipe myself. I’m still not sure I have enough pipe but my ground loop no longer overheats or over chills. I have yet to get a handle on the efficincy of the system because I doubled the size of the house and the old heating system was resistance heat in the ceiling so it does not compare. Bills on the double size house are lower than with ceiling heat though.
From what I can tell these systems are much more common in Indiana and Oklahoma. Anoyone else have one in So Cal?