<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clean Tech: &quot;It&#039;s the institutional investors, stupid.&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/</link>
	<description>Clean Tech News &#38; Views: Solar Energy News. Wind Energy News. EV News. &#38; More.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Investors Getting Serious in London &#8212; $1 Billion Renewable Energy Fund : CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Investors Getting Serious in London &#8212; $1 Billion Renewable Energy Fund : CleanTechnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>[...] Stories: 1) Clean Tech: #1 in Worldwide Venture Capital Investments 2) Clean Tech: “It’s the institutional investors, stupid.” 3) Clean Tech Private Equity Firm Reaches &amp; Exceeds $1 Billion Target for Clean Tech Fund! 4) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stories: 1) Clean Tech: #1 in Worldwide Venture Capital Investments 2) Clean Tech: “It’s the institutional investors, stupid.” 3) Clean Tech Private Equity Firm Reaches &amp; Exceeds $1 Billion Target for Clean Tech Fund! 4) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Birth of CleanTechnica &#124; ecopolitology</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>The Birth of CleanTechnica &#124; ecopolitology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>[...] was brought on board for has finally launched, and I am very excited to be a regular contributor at CleanTechnica.com, where I will publish every Friday (and as timely news rolls in). The folks at GO have assembled a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was brought on board for has finally launched, and I am very excited to be a regular contributor at CleanTechnica.com, where I will publish every Friday (and as timely news rolls in). The folks at GO have assembled a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clean Tech: &#34;It&#8217;s the Institutional investors, stupid.&#34; &#124; ecopolitology</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Clean Tech: &#34;It&#8217;s the Institutional investors, stupid.&#34; &#124; ecopolitology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>[...] following article was originally published at CleanTechnica on February 15, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following article was originally published at CleanTechnica on February 15, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleantech Investment Slowdown Predicted in 2009 : CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleantech Investment Slowdown Predicted in 2009 : CleanTechnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>[...] Group also is predicting that the failure rate for cleantech startups will double in 2009, and that global climate-change policies will take several years to negotiate, among other forecasts. For more information on these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Group also is predicting that the failure rate for cleantech startups will double in 2009, and that global climate-change policies will take several years to negotiate, among other forecasts. For more information on these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Birth of CleanTechnica &#124; Looks and Charisma</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>The Birth of CleanTechnica &#124; Looks and Charisma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>[...] was brought on board for has finally launched, and I am very excited to be a regular contributor at CleanTechnica.com, where I will publish every Friday (and as timely news rolls in). The folks at GO have assembled a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was brought on board for has finally launched, and I am very excited to be a regular contributor at CleanTechnica.com, where I will publish every Friday (and as timely news rolls in). The folks at GO have assembled a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renewables to Boom or Bust? : CleanTechnica</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Renewables to Boom or Bust? : CleanTechnica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-232</guid>
		<description>[...] Hurst recently wrote an article about U.S. Investors and renewable energy. This post is designed as a compliment to that news [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hurst recently wrote an article about U.S. Investors and renewable energy. This post is designed as a compliment to that news [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Oscar, thanks for your comment. I think you&#039;re right, most people have better things to worry about than the social/ethical/environmental actions in their pension funds. But I also think consciousness is on the rise and growing transparency in the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oscar, thanks for your comment. I think you&#8217;re right, most people have better things to worry about than the social/ethical/environmental actions in their pension funds. But I also think consciousness is on the rise and growing transparency in the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-16889</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-16889</guid>
		<description>Oscar, thanks for your comment. I think you&#039;re right, most people have better things to worry about than the social/ethical/environmental actions in their pension funds. But I also think consciousness is on the rise and growing transparency in the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oscar, thanks for your comment. I think you&#8217;re right, most people have better things to worry about than the social/ethical/environmental actions in their pension funds. But I also think consciousness is on the rise and growing transparency in the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar Cardenas</title>
		<link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar Cardenas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/15/clean-tech-its-the-institutional-investors-stupid/#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Timothy, you&#039;ve given me much to think about. I was a county employee for 12 years and a federal employee four years prior. I can tell you that all any of us cared about was whether or not our pensions and medical were safe. Though there&#039;s always a risk, I think that our coffers would have been strengthened by investing in the current wave of clean technology had it been available back then; however, it doesn&#039;t mean we wouldn&#039;t have been scared. Nice post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy, you&#8217;ve given me much to think about. I was a county employee for 12 years and a federal employee four years prior. I can tell you that all any of us cared about was whether or not our pensions and medical were safe. Though there&#8217;s always a risk, I think that our coffers would have been strengthened by investing in the current wave of clean technology had it been available back then; however, it doesn&#8217;t mean we wouldn&#8217;t have been scared. Nice post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

